Secret NB Minimus Sale!

We’re having a secret NB Minimus Sale- For a LIMITED TIME, you can get 10% OFF + FREE SHIPPING on any NB Minimus shoe! Enter code: NBATLANTA10D @ checkout. This is an exclusive sale for all of our followers on FB, Twitter and bloggers! Not looking for a Minimus shoe? That’s cool, you can still use the code because it’s good site-wide! Only at shopnewbalance.com


 

NB Minimus is a barefoot-inspired line of shoes created specifically for runners seeking a truly minimalist experience. It’s a cross-category collection, including road running, trail running, and wellness shoes. By ‘wellness’ we mean shoes designed for people seeking a more natural stance throughout the day, even when they’re not exercising.

MT10/WT10: An entirely different approach to trail running, the MT10 Minimus Trail takes the proven versatile durability of a Vibram® outsole and combines it with a fitted, minimalist upper that’s comfortable with or without socks.

MR10/WR10: Minimus is a whole new approach to athletic footwear, inspired by Good Form Running and designed to be worn with or without socks. The Minimus Road running shoe is engineered for use on pavement and other varied running surfaces. Supremely comfortable and extremely lightweight, the MR10 is taking the running world by storm.

MW10/WW10: Minimus is a whole new approach to athletic footwear, inspired by Good Form Running and designed to be worn with or without socks. The MW10 Minimus Wellness shoe is sublimely comfortable, engineered for recovery use as well as for other casual wear.

NB Minimus Now Here

Katherine Petrecca: NB Minimus is a barefoot-inspired line of shoes created specifically for runners seeking a truly minimalist experience. It’s a cross-category collection, including road running, trail running, and wellness shoes. By ‘wellness’ we mean shoes designed for people seeking a more natural stance throughout the day, even when they’re not exercising.

NB Minimus

NB MINIMUS TRAIL MT10/WT10
NB MINIMUS ROAD MR10/WR10
NB MINIMUS LIFE MW/WW10
In setting out to create a line of shoes that would provide the ultimate minimalist experience, we worked against a clearly-defined set of criteria:


Drop is the difference between heel height and toe height. All NB Minimus shoes have a 4mm drop which provides a more natural foot position than traditional shoes.
The wider forefoot in NB Minimus allows your foot to expand naturally on impact.
To minimize distance from foot to ground, NB Minimus has no insert, minimal midsoles & outsoles, and is engineered to encourage a midfoot strike.
Because NB Minimus contains only what is necessary, it’s almost 50% lighter than traditional lightweight shoes.

Anton Krupicka presents New Balance Minimus Trail

At New Balance, we know that people are actively looking for ways in which they can keep running throughout their lifetime. Naturally, that’s something we are interested in supporting! The current trend towards minimalism is creating curiosity and buzz around running, which we hope will bring more runners into the fold. As the NB Minimus story continues to unfold over the next few months, we’ll continue to bring this story to the running community.


New Balance MT101 and WT101

The New Balance 101 is the perfect trail racing shoe for runners looking for a “minimalistic” shoe, reminiscent of a “barefoot” running experience. The stream-lined upper features overlays on the lateral side to hold feet in place through downhill runs and very few internal seams help to eliminate irritation even when the shoes are worn without socks. A thin protective ROCKSTOP© plate in the outsole protects feet from punctures and disperses shock without sacrificing the natural running feel. The New Balance 101 is equipped to deliver a smooth and responsive ride on any trail.

Team New Balance trail runners, Kyle Skaggs and Anton Krupicka, provided inspiration and design direction for the MT/WT101 Skaggs, winner and course record holder of the Hardrock 100 Endurance Run and Krupicka, two-time winner of the Leadville 100, tested the 101 throughout the design and development process, bringing the “ultra running” mindset to every aspect of the shoes. Their insights helped to utilize a revised manufacturing process to create a smoother heel counter to reduce irritation. Even the insole bares the mark of the NB Ambassadors; the bandana printed sock liner is in honor of Tony Kupricka, who wears a bandana during all of his runs.

Exclusive TriCity NB MT/WT 101 pics below:

Return to Leadville

Ultramarathoner Anton Krupicka meets the 100-miler head on once again.

How does one of the world’s most remarkable athletes approach one of the world’s most remarkable sporting events? Three days before toeing the starting line at the Leadville 100-Mile Run – the notoriously difficult ultramarathon he conquered in 2006 and 2007 – we sat down with Team New Balance’s Anton Krupicka to talk about the course, the field and his mindset as he prepares to return to the race that’s been witness to some of his greatest triumphs and struggles.

Leadville Trail 100

Leadville Trail 100 MTB Race Map

One of the best-known 100-mile races in the country, the legendary Leadville run began in 1983. Aptly nicknamed “The Race Across the Sky,” the run courses through the heart of the Colorado Rockies on forest trails and mountain roads, its low point clocking in at 9,200 feet.
Leading for much of last year’s run, Krupicka had to pull out at mile 78 after being plagued by a stomach bug for most of the race.
Western States 100

Leadville Trail 100

Run in June near Squaw Valley, California, The Western States 100 is one of four races (along with Leadville) that comprise the so-called “Western Slam” – a series of 100-mile races that also includes The Wasatch Front 100 and the Angeles Crest 100. In the 2010 event, Anton finished second to Geoff Roes in what is widely considered to be among the best ultra races ever run.

NewBalance.com: How are you feeling?
Anton Krupicka: Good. I mean, in terms of being ready to race, I’m feeling well.

NB.com: Last year [before Leadville] you said you were feeling pretty good on Thursday and Friday. Are your legs feeling about the same?
AK: Yeah, you know it’s weird. I didn’t enter the race officially until yesterday. I guess that was a result of just not getting around to doing it. But I didn’t actually decide to race until last week, so the usual anticipation and emotional and mental build-up to it has been a lot more subdued – which I think is a good thing, actually.

Before the Western States 100 earlier this summer, I’d been thinking about it for at least two months – thinking about it every day, several times a day. For Leadville, it’s a little more laid-back, a little more relaxed. Last year I felt a fair amount of pressure going in [to Leadville], and this year I don’t feel much pressure – so, yeah, it’s good.

NB.com: You’ve mentioned on your blog a number of times that the reality of running a 100-mile race doesn’t even kick in fully until you’re out there running it.
AK: Yeah, you can mentally prepare for it, but it doesn’t really hit you until you get to 60 or 70 miles, and you’re like “Jeez…I’ve kind of put in a lot of mileage already today, and I’m only 60 percent done.” It’s tough to wrap your mind around that.

NB.com: I think it’s tough for anyone to wrap their mind around what it is you do. Trying to articulate the scale and scope of a 100-mile run over mountain terrain and what that really means is pretty difficult.
AK: I think I may have written this someplace before, but the first time I did it I was really interested in just finding out what it was like to run 100 miles, and I came away thinking that it’s a big deal – and not a big deal. It forces you into an emotional, physical and mental place that not many people experience in their day-to-day life. Everything is stripped down to almost this sense of survival. On the other hand, it’s just running. It’s just a 50-mile race, and you just keep going – you keep eating gel, keep drinking water, and put one foot in front of the other.

NB.com: At what point is it really more about not stopping as opposed to continuing to run? Is there a distinction there?
AK: Oh yeah. I used to think that there was a point where that happened. Then at Western States this year, I learned that it really was possible – at least for me and a few of the top guys – to race the whole way, just because I was pushed so hard all the way to the finish, and eventually passed and beaten.

In the past though, after running for 70 miles, I was always focused on just keeping moving for the last 30 and getting to the finish line. Now though, I think that if you mete out your effort all day long you can get to 60 or 70 miles and really be ready to race and actually run hard, relatively speaking. It’s strange how the more experienced you become, the more possible it is to actually race the entire way.

NB.com: You had noted last year, after you and Tim Parr went out so quickly, your urge to race early on had you both running at a pace that was a little too fast. Does this new mentality reflect a learning you’ve had over the last year?
AK: Absolutely. It was definitely a lesson that I learned from the Leadville 100 last year. It’s a really fine line that you’re riding between going too fast and not going fast enough. It’s really easy to step over that line in a 100-mile race because in the first half (of the race) everything feels really easy – even if the pace is too fast. You won’t know that the pace is too fast until you get to the second half and you’re blown out [laughs].

In Western States this year, I just decided it was going to be all about racing and not chasing any kind of time standard – and that’s definitely the attitude I’m taking to the race [Leadville] this weekend too. I just want to compete well, and if that happens I’m sure that I’ll be in the ballpark of running a very fast time.

NB.com: You said last year that any finish time that started with a number higher than 15 (a 16-hour or longer time) was going to be disappointing to you. It sounds like your thinking has evolved pretty dramatically.
AK: It has changed, yeah. This year, I don’t care about the finish time. I just want to win. If I get to 70 miles and I’m on course record pace, I’m certainly going to be keying on the splits and trying to get the course record. Early on though, I’m not going to be concerned about time splits at all. I’m not going to consciously push the pace to be on course record time. I’m just going to be running within myself and competing against the other runners.

NB.com: To what extent does familiarity with the terrain play a role in a highly technical race like this?
AK: I have really mixed feelings about this. I used to think that course familiarity was really important. Over the last couple of years though, I’ve had a number of good races on courses I’ve never set foot on before – the Western States 100, Miwok 100k, even the White River 50 last year. I’d never really previewed those courses before going and racing them, and while it’s nice to know where the key climbs are, there’s something really refreshing about being on a new trail on new terrain. It helps to know what you’re in for, but not knowing every step and stone is kind of a nice thing.

At Leadville, I know that course inside and out, but I haven’t set foot on the course itself since the race last year. I’m really excited about that, actually, because I know every rock and root, but when I get on the starting line this year will be the first time that I’ve been on the course for 12 months and it’s going to be really fresh and exciting for me. It’s funny that in the last few years it’s been kind of mundane and boring.

NB.com: I think most people when thinking about ultramarathons have this idea of a “lone wolf” runner. Clearly though, you have a team of people that play a role in a race like Leadville, don’t you?
AK: Oh yeah. Especially at Leadville, your crew and pacer are crucial because your pacer is allowed to carry stuff for you – in most 100-milers that’s not the case – and your crew can see you in every single aid station, except one at Hope Pass which they can’t get to. So you get to see your crew a lot, and your pacer has a much more involved role than just keeping your head in the game and keeping you company.

Like I said before, there’s a big difference between training and racing. When I’m training, I really like the solitude and being out there in a place where I’m self-reliant and stripped down to the bare essentials. In racing – it sounds really alpha – but it’s really results-oriented, and I’m exploring a much different part of my running psyche through racing. It helps to have that support crew to really facilitate that by making everything as efficient as possible. When I say “making things efficient,” I mean that the crew is essential to shaving minutes off of the final time.

And it’s fun. A few years ago I had one guy, (New Balance Outdoor Ambassador) Kyle Skaggs, pacing me the entire last 50 miles. When you have that, you’re running half the race with that person. By the end, you really feel this bond of “Wow, we just did something.”

NB.com: So at Leadville this year, there are some 780 entrants. Most probably won’t finish. Only a few have a shot at contending. At the risk of asking a politically tricky question, how many of those people belong in a race so arduous and demanding?
AK: I don’t think that too many are putting themselves in harm’s way. Leadville’s a special case because there’s zero qualifying standard. [To enter] Western States you have to at least show that you can run 50 miles in less than 11 hours, which is a super-soft time anyhow. At least it’s something though, that you can run at least 50 miles.

In Leadville, if you’ve got the $350, you can be on the starting line. You see that this year – it’s easily the largest 100-mile field ever assembled in North America, almost double any other race ever. Historically, the finishing percentage at Leadville is 40%. This year, I’d expect it to be quite a bit lower than that, which is kind of sad. When less than 40% of people finish, that’s a lot of disappointed people going home.

NB.com: This year, for the first time, Burning Man is hosting an ultra.
AK: No way! Really?

NB.com: Yeah. And while Burning Man isn’t exactly mainstream, there seems to be a sense to which the sport is gaining a lot more mainstream attention.
AK: For sure. Books like Dean Karnazes’ Ultramarathon Man and Chris [McDougall]’s Born to Run are inspiring people to get out there and be active, and that’s great. Part of what’s happened is that ultramarathons have really gravitated towards trail racing. They used to be a lot more road-oriented, but now it’s much more a trail sport. Hopefully those folks are inspired by the landscapes that they’re running through and come to value those things. Those have become the things that I value highly in my life, and it’s a great feeling when other people value them too.

NB.com: What kind of training have you been doing over the last several weeks – even as you weren’t certain that you’d enter – in preparation for Leadville?
AK: Well, the White River 50 was only three weeks ago. There’s a 7-mile downhill in the last 15 miles of that race and you end up running that really hard. That descent was really hard on my right knee, which has been chronically sore for the past year and half. I was really up in the air as to whether it could withstand 100 miles. Thankfully, about ten days ago, it completely cleared up and I’ve been feeling 100%.

I think I’ll be coming into this race about as rested as I ever have for a 100-mile run and easily the most fit I’ve ever been, too. It’s been a matter of getting in enough long runs to keep feeling confident and being rested enough to be healthy and ready to race.

NB.com: You sound confident.
AK: Good! I’m really relaxed about it, which is kind of strange. There’s not a lot of pressure. I’ve already done a 100-miler this summer [at the Western States 100], and it went well. I had a really good race three weeks ago [the White River 50], so yeah, I’m feeling confident. I love racing. There’s nothing like being recovered and ready to roll and getting to be out in the mountains cruising all day. It’s a blast.

New Balance MR790 Sale

With all the hype surrounding barefoot/minimus running and the release of the New Balance MT101 and other minimal footwear a ways away (March 2011), let’s not forget about the shoe that started it- New Balance MR790. This shoe is just about the only New Balance running shoe out there that will help mimic barefoot running.

Right now, we have 3 different colors in full stock! Stop by and check them out today, as they go out of stock with a quickness. As a special offer, enter in “school” @ checkout to save 10% off your purchase + receive Free Shipping!

MR790BKR

MR790WNG

MR790GBY

New Balance Minimus Running

Meet NB Minimus: An interview with Katherine Petrecca

As was made obvious by the response generated by our article on barefoot running, a significant portion of the New Balance community is curious about a more minimalist approach to running. At New Balance, we get excited about anything that enhances the running experience, so when we had the opportunity to talk to Katherine Petrecca, who is managing the upcoming NB Minimus collection, we jumped at the chance.

Katherine Petrecca

“We feel very strongly that building great minimal footwear is about something far more substantial than stripping as much as you can out of a shoe.”

NewBalance.com: Let’s start with the basics. What, exactly, is NB Minimus?
Katherine Petrecca: NB Minimus is a barefoot-inspired line of shoes created specifically for runners seeking a truly minimalist experience. It’s a cross-category collection, including road running, trail running, and wellness shoes. By ‘wellness’ we mean shoes designed for people seeking a more natural stance throughout the day, even when they’re not exercising.

NewBalance.com: And when are they coming?
Katherine Petrecca: The first NB Minimus shoes will be available in March 2011.

NewBalance.com: Why would someone choose to wear a minimalist shoe?
Katherine Petrecca: We view these shoes very much as tools that encourage better running form, and help strengthen the legs and feet. As important, a great minimal shoe should deliver increased ground feel and control, which is what makes them so much fun to use.

“Light + Right”
In setting out to create a line of shoes that would provide the ultimate minimalist experience, we worked against a clearly-defined set of criteria:

Katherine Petrecca

Drop:
‘Drop’ is the difference between heel height and toe height. All NB Minimus shoes have a 4mm drop which provides a more neutral foot position than traditional shoes (which average a 12mm drop).

Katherine Petrecca

Last:
The wider forefoot in NB Minimus allows your foot to expand naturally on impact

Katherine Petrecca

Height:
To minimize distance from foot to ground, NB Minimus has no insert, minimal midsoles & outsoles, and is engineered to encourage a midfoot strike

Katherine Petrecca

Weight:
Because NB Minimus contains only what is necessary, it’s almost 50% lighter than traditional lightweight shoes

NewBalance.com: So how did you go about bringing these to life?
Katherine Petrecca: First, it’s important to note that New Balance already has a large following among runners who prefer minimal footwear, so NB Minimus isn’t really something new to us, but rather an extension of products that we’ve already been making. For the last 4 years, we’ve produced minimal trail shoes that were developed and tested with world-class ultrarunners who are also trained midfoot strikers, so gathering input from Tony Krupicka and Kyle Skaggs for the development of the MT100 and MT101 was an obvious step. These shoes have a very loyal following in the hardcore running community. In addition, we’ve always made a minimal product for our elite running and track athletes. It’s great to see broader interest in that kind of shoe.

With NB Minimus, the idea is to balance this desire to deliver a “closer to barefoot” experience with the realities of the terrain on which people are running today, and the fact that most of us have been raised in shoes. With that in mind, for NB Minimus we developed a new, more anatomically-correct last, along with midsole heights specifically-engineered to deliver more natural movement, and better form. People will also notice that the uppers are a lot thinner, which helps reduce weight. The increased ground feel was accomplished by employing thin, flexible midsoles, and eliminating the inserts.

NewBalance.com: How will they be different from shoes that are already on the market?
Katherine Petrecca: We’ve vigorously pursued a path we call ‘Light+Right’. We feel very strongly that building great minimal footwear is about something far more substantial than stripping as much as you can out of a shoe. To us, a meaningful ‘closer to barefoot’ experience is something very specific: a shoe with a neutral foot position, meaning that it has a minimal drop from heel to forefoot. It’s certainly lightweight – under 8.5 ounces – although we’re not content to make another lightweight shoe and call it ‘minimal’. Also, and this is really important, it has to deliver a great minimal running experience – enhanced ground feel and a barefoot-compatible interior. That, of course, means reducing the number of seams, and making the shoe highly-breathable. We believe that we’ve done this with NB Minimus – and that when you examine many of the shoes from our competitors currently billed as ‘minimal’ or ‘barefoot-inspired’, you can see where they miss the mark.

NewBalance.com: To what extent is the popularity of minimal shoes being driven by scientific research?
Katherine Petrecca: Well, increasingly, people are becoming familiar with the research done by Dr. Daniel Lieberman at Harvard which explores the collision mechanics of different kinds of foot strikes. His research shows that most experienced, habitual barefoot runners tend to avoid landing on the heel and instead land with a forefoot or midfoot strike. In addition, the research proved that most forefoot and some midfoot strikes (shod and barefoot) do not generate the sudden, large impact that occurs when you heel strike (shod or barefoot).

In short, it suggests that the body is built to land with a midfoot to forefoot strike and that our anatomy is better-suited to absorb the impact of landing with that gait.

We’ve done some really interesting research in our Sports Lab over the past year. Our results are in line with the research from Harvard in relation to striking tendencies and impact forces at strike. We found that runners adjust their gait to a more midfoot or forefoot strike as the heights of the midsole are reduced from a traditional shoe down to barefoot.

NewBalance.com: What are the plans for the future?
Katherine Petrecca: Our goals for expanding NB Minimus are really two-fold: First, we’re going to continue to evolve the collection to incorporate different levels of the minimal experience. Second, we are exploring ways by which we can bring a more minimal approach to our broader, established product line. As always, we’ll be working with our elite athletes to constantly refine and perfect the ways in which these shoes deliver this “closer to barefoot” experience.

At New Balance, we know that people are actively looking for ways in which they can keep running throughout their lifetime. Naturally, that’s something we are interested in supporting! The current trend towards minimalism is creating curiosity and buzz around running, which we hope will bring more runners into the fold. As the NB Minimus story continues to unfold over the next few months, we’ll continue to bring this story to the running community.

Barefoot Running

Naked Feet – A Look At The Barefoot Running Movement

Naked Feet - A Look At The Barefoot Running Movement

Update: After speaking with Dr. Lieberman of the study mentioned below, we’ve edited the first few paragraphs for accuracy and clarity. To view the original article click here.

After hundreds of years of walking with shoes on, is it time we relearn? There’s a movement going on that challenges the very foundation of sneaker wearers (not to mention sneaker companies) everywhere, around running barefoot. This broad grouping of perspectives includes some runners who are finding they prefer to run exclusively barefoot, some who prefer to run with minimally cushioned shoes, and others who like to vary their runs between shod, minimally shod, and shoeless. Recently, runner and Harvard researcher Daniel Lieberman released a study in the journal Nature (subscription required) that ignited broad popular discussion on the topic. Lieberman’s research explored the physics behind the various ways the foot comes into contact with a surface when in shoes and shoeless, and found that most shod runners favor a heel-first strike while shoeless runners tend to naturally strike forefoot- or in some cases midfoot-first.

The underlying mechanical theory is based on the simple fact that a shoeless foot striking the ground heel-first, tends to hurt. As the study’s site explains, “This is because the human heel pad cannot cushion much of the impact force (Ker et al., 1995; Chi and Schmitt, 2005) and this force is concentrated on a small area of the heel. Many shod runners asked to run barefoot in laboratory conditions (a treadmill or trackway) switch to a midfoot or forefoot strike.” Lieberman’s research did not explore or favor a particular type of strike over the other in terms of injury prevention, or seek to show that barefoot running is objectively “better” than shod running, but many publications (including ours in this article) initially understood it as making such a claim.

Apart from and in addition to discussion on the recent study, there are advocates and skeptics of barefoot running. The majority of runners still take issue with forgoing footwear at this point. On a practical level alone, it’s hard to fathom running through a dirty city, along the river in the cold, or even in a twig and stone-ridden forest without some sort of shoe for protection. And—think about it—during a race, it doesn’t seem like hitting the porto for a bio break would be the most sanitary of options.

So where does that leave us?

At New Balance, we’re committed to developing shoes with various levels of cushioning and support—from very little to plenty. And we’re continually exploring the human foot and the best way to accommodate it. We do this by working with renowned bio-mechanical engineers, podiatrists, and top-ranked ultra-marathoners—even barefoot ones. In this way, we’re able to offer footwear options for all kinds of needs—from the most minimal support on upwards. Unless of course you’re going barefoot. Then we’ll just cheer you on and offer another kind of support—the emotional kind.

For additional perspectives on barefoot running, here are some helpful sources: